You literally have no idea what the word means. You've probably never read John Locke or Adam Smith or any of the other Enlightenment figures. The word has been morphed into its exact opposite, and Ron Paul is an exemplification. Today it means being an advocate for complete tyranny, which favors completely handing over the reins to private power,

which is even worse than state power because at least that's still somewhat accountable to the public. That has nothing to do with what the term originally meant, and still means everywhere else in the world except the US and a good part of the West.

You literally know nothing about Chomsky. He's never said "put me in power". He has said "don't put me in power". He advocates for public control rather than one figure at the top who decides things. He's specifically stated that he doesn't like the word "leader" and prefers "representative", because that more clearly describes the role someone should have in a system of representation. He's been asked to run for president and he's said "no, I don't believe in that kind of system of leadership".

You literally know nothing about the things you're talking about.

Good to know you've never read Adam Smith, either, because you've missed the point of his famous Wealth of Nations completely.

PS:

Believing that wealth should be more equally distributed does not make you a FULL BLOWN COMMUNIST!

It makes you a decent person.