I like SuSE and believe it or not i actually like ubuntu. im not a HARDCORE LINUX GUY at all and have only really used a small handful of distros (the "most" hardcore i used was freebsd which made me feel very cool for a few days) (in fact i think linux fanboys are as bad as mac fanboys). my point was more that you shouldn't go around sayin g"heh.....i use linux. im a ubuntu guy."
but really i was being a dick so sorry jmickle just old dickhead gr over here! dont listen to me! the last ubuntu i used was 7 though.
i don't know i don't support this ethic that people have that now that computers can handle being bloated you should bloat everything.
i dont mean to be condescending at all and im not assuming you dont know anything about computers, but I think you are mixing up "bloat" with "diverse functionality". the reason OSes these days (yes even including xp) are "bloated" is not because they toss in random unnecessary shit (which they do) but because they do a LOT of stuff. they are constantly doing things in the background. i'm as much against unnecessary bloat as the next guy, fuck im a programmer!
but dude, i have a sql server running on my box, and always a visual studio open (right now i have 2 visual studios both running a project!!), outlook open, instant messenger open, i have an RDP session open, mirc, foobar, firefox with... 8 tabs open, a vpn client, SVN client, with a total 1400 megs used out of 2 gigs. 500 of that is firefox! another 450 of that is visual studio! tha tmeans EVERYTHING ELSE, INCLUDING THE OS, is using around 400 megabytes of ram. I wouldn't call that bloat, would you?
also, for the record, why have 3 gigs of ram if you never use more than 1/5 of it?