Attention GZ! PANDA! IM HERE TO HELP YOU *sits with a thumb up their ass* (Read 8214 times)

  • aye ess dee eff el cay jay ache
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 24, 2005
  • Posts: 5149
yes it is. you don't send out the test to only those you think will pass, that's what the point of the test is. get in as many people as possible and weed out the ones that aren't sustainable
I USE Q'S INSTEQD OF Q'S
  • Avatar of YourHero
  • unidentified.
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jan 24, 2004
  • Posts: 692
i like the idea of expanding to other topics... would we have to totally get rid of the gaming people? couldn't they stay part of broader site/forum?
sometimes, you need to quote yourself to feel important.
  • Avatar of GZ
  • Gythol Granditti will be out "soon". Honest.
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jan 16, 2003
  • Posts: 789
there was something there - the blog. that was a fine intermediate form. it served its purpose. releasing this and claiming it to be the new site is basically an insult because it isn't a new site. it's the blog with a facelift.
large parts of a site are navigation, services, and content. the new site provides better navigation and services (individual reviews, improved search, article submission) than the last site. it also has better content because we actually have quality control this time around instead of just carrying any article. the only features we are missing from the original GW6 site plan are devlogs and a resource database (which at the moment is deliberately not integrated until we find out what to do with it) as far as i remember. given this i don't really understand how you can say it's the blog with a facelift.

oh right gaming world is trying to be That Site That Offers A Few Articles But Nothing Else And Isn't Really That Great great plan guys keep up the good work
this has to do with content which we are trying to solve in this very topic. good job being a douche bag about it though.

i don't even know why there is a talk about shifting the focus. the members here are going to be deciding the content because this is where the staff and submissions will be coming from 99% of the time. i think though that GW is just going to fall flat as anything but a gaming site at the moment. the site is called GAMING WORLD for starters, and it's what the community has been most of it's life span. abandoning that would be a bad idea. if anything, you could say we've already abandoned game making because the majority of our articles are about the community or topics that aren't games. there is nothing i can really suggest to people other than making good, solid content for the site. this is what is going to bring people here, but it takes time.
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
you have to burn the site.
brian chemicals
  • Avatar of JORGE_LUIS_BORGES_A
  • I'm using the custom user title
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Sep 29, 2003
  • Posts: 109
burn books
burn game making
burn knowlege
from the embers we will extract a new community
from death will come new life
  • Avatar of JORGE_LUIS_BORGES_A
  • I'm using the custom user title
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Sep 29, 2003
  • Posts: 109
to all game makers i say:

i am the herald of your destruction
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
the kind of humorous thing about this is the site already exists as many of you apparently want it to, more or less.  we have ten times more GENERAL content than we do game dev content; what most of you seem to be advocating would more or less just be a superficial shift that reflects the content we already generate.
  • Avatar of JORGE_LUIS_BORGES_A
  • I'm using the custom user title
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Sep 29, 2003
  • Posts: 109
yes
  • Avatar of JORGE_LUIS_BORGES_A
  • I'm using the custom user title
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Sep 29, 2003
  • Posts: 109
good luck generating tons of game making content
  • Avatar of Von Woofen
  • Super Saiyan Sam
  • PipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 19, 2004
  • Posts: 289
ill write articles in the case that anyone wants to hear hand-me-down anecdotes about drugs and fights. or...first hand stories about hanging things on a wall for a store no one comes in to.
  • Avatar of the_bub_from_the_pit
  • Power to the flowers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 17, 2005
  • Posts: 1608
also, why is dom such a huge dick in like every single post i've seen him make for like the past week?
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
idk if thats fair game to point out XD
brian chemicals
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
yeah it's hard as fuck and not even gz or myself or anyone for that matter is sure we can do it.  don't be patronizing about it though; it's pretty obnoxious and fairly presumptuous considering we've spent hours upon hours discussing this very thing.  whoa you're right it never occurred to any of us that this would be a struggle!

another funny thing about this topic is how completely useless it has become.  i like how people come out in droves to talk about WHAT THEY THINK GW SHOULD BE.  these topics are always annoying to read because it is a bunch of conflicting opinions of people who do not have the full picture of things and apparently just want to think up ways for the site to be better and stand back while someone else does the work.

anyway these are pretty poorly conceived suggestions.  while there is a glimmer of hope that we can, with enough work, turn gw into a functioning indie game site with a decent amount of content, especially considering how easy it is to just HAVE GAMES, there is no way gw would thrive as a general entertainment site.  initiating such a radical shift in focus as to DITCH ALL GAME DEV would basically put gw in its death throes.  it doesn't really matter if you are embarrassed to tell your friends about gw, or if you don't care about game dev anymore; it is literally all we have to base a site around that would be of any interest to anyone.  the quality of the GENERAL writing we have is not good enough for this to take place, and our community at the moment is weak enough that we probably would not recover from the hit we would take by cutting off the game development segment of our community.  when it comes right down to it, we just do not have that many interesting people here.  the site would be subpar.  you need to be FUNNY and ENGAGING for this to work and we have very few people like that here.

you do not need to be nearly as funny or engaging to just write game dev articles or tutorials, or reviews or whatever else.  this is why the chances of gw surviving as an indie games site are still much higher than gw surviving as random mediocre entertainment website #3257.  the problem right now is obviously a lack of people to generate game dev content, but we will have a much easier time pulling in people who are willing to write about indie gaming than we will pulling in people (new members or current ones) who would be consistently interesting enough to write general articles.

it will be very difficult but gw might someday actually be a decent game dev site if we can get it out there to the right people (as in, non rpg maker people).  this is because there just aren't that many legitimately good game dev sites, and in general i think it is easier to succeed in this area with what we are or could feasibly be equipped with in the future.  conversely, basically no one RUNNING GW feels like we would ever have a shot at having the members or pulling in enough of the right people to be a good general entertainment website.  it is much harder for a site to gain any amount of notoriety in this niche as there are just so many websites that would be as good or, more likely, better than us.  this might be the case with the game dev niche as well but it is 10x less daunting in terms of how GOOD you need to be to even get noticed and how many sites you are actively competing with and what you can do to attract new members.  i feel, along with gz, steel, and many others, that pursuing game dev over GENERAL SHIT is our only realistic option and that shifting the focus of the site to something more general would probably KILL GW or, at the very least, ruin any chance of it being a successful website that more than current members read (heh, ggz. . .).
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
Quote
the quality of the GENERAL writing we have is not good enough

to elaborate on this, first off remember as I said earlier we have approx FIVE STAFFERS, even if gw became general forum: the site, people aren't contributing to that aspect of the site now!

secondly he's so right man. a lot of people give me props for articles buuuut I've never proofread a one. I jacked a book's STRUCTURE by accident for fuck's sake (to the extent that if and when I get back to it I'm not going to touch on a single subject they did and just tell people to buy the book). compare this to something from the AV Club which isn't a newspaper but is really the level you need to be at for something like this to succeed.

like first off this one guy just bought a BOX OF BOOKS for like ten bucks. just shitty paperback books and he's reviewing it and it's funny. another guy did not listen to any new music for an entire year. like if the radio is on he turns it off. no singles. no idea who or what Katy Perry is. has to rely on all his old music and find out what he's been ignoring. we don't have ideas like this! that failed list thing was my secret attempt to gauge if the staff did and that just collapsed; Rowain's was easily the best. then you just have better writing in general. part of this is because the staff doesn't do what I said to do; namely, KEEP WRITING SHIT. the less you write, the more you fall apart. they also don't read anything! similar problem. my best articles like that Facebook one were written when I was reading good funny non-fiction. there's a rhythm to these things but we don't have it at all!
brian chemicals
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
http://www.avclub.com/articles/taste-test-cheeseburger-in-a-can,2183/

I had this exact fucking idea fuck you av club.
brian chemicals
  • Avatar of JORGE_LUIS_BORGES_A
  • I'm using the custom user title
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Sep 29, 2003
  • Posts: 109
I'll repeat gw is not dying, GW does not need to recover, GW is successful now
  • Avatar of JORGE_LUIS_BORGES_A
  • I'm using the custom user title
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Sep 29, 2003
  • Posts: 109
let game making fall into the shadows
viva gaming world
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
nah the activity has actually been drastically dropping off for quite a few years now and at this point the forum is sustained by a relatively small amount of CORE MEMBERS who themselves are slowly leaving without being replaced because we have perhaps a tenth the stream of new blood we had in the past (as in, we have maybe 5 ACTIVE NEW MEMBERS from 2008 who continue to post and become part of the community).  we have NO NEW MEMBERS who actually join the community, essentially, and real members still continue to leave on a fairly regular basis.  idk how you quantify successful for this to fit the bill.
  • Avatar of JORGE_LUIS_BORGES_A
  • I'm using the custom user title
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Sep 29, 2003
  • Posts: 109
im not sure your fully thinking about the implications of these 'problems'
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
ya got me
Locked