peta hasn't gotten that many people to think differently, just to come out publically. come on guys this argument wouldn't fly if we were talking about GAY MARRIAGE or whatever, peta did not create a bunch of vegetarians and vegans and the idea of ethical food has been around for centuries. if there were no peta the number of vegetarians might be a bit smaller but more importantly the number of people who are violently against animal rights would be nil as peta tends to shoot themselves in the foot all the time.
like they have clearly copyright infringed on both Cooking Mama and Mario Bros on their games site. and then they are RIDICULOUS; the Cooking Mama game, instead of focusing on bad factory conditions or the health benefits of vegetarianism, has you crack open eggs full of dead chickens into a bowl. hmmm except no one has done this. whoops.
If Ronald McDonald House turned out to be profiteering would you refuse to help kids with needs?
I don't understand how "heh I'm going to eat extra meat and kill as many animals as possible" is a better attitude to have than to do a poor job promoting vegan-ism, which really DOES help animals, health, enviroment, etc.
the RM House is not only not the only charitable organization, it's not even the best, and it's primarily funded by GASP McDonalds, could you really not think of a better organization? also the only person to make the first argument was nackster, for which he got warned.
eric maybe...politics is not binary??? or should we just rename you to the erictruth?
