Topic: beanbag activism (Read 3822 times)

  • Avatar of jamie
  • ruined former youth seeking atonement
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 4, 2003
  • Posts: 3581
Yeah I was talking about those too. I can't disprove those immediately but I just don't buy them as being any use and my intuition about those things is usually pretty good. I mean animals would turn on us if they had the position? flippin heck...

dependent on us eating them? Nah, that crap will work itself out. If there's too many of a species then they'll dwindle down to a sustainable number naturally pretty quickly without us lending a helping hand, and yeah that's a waste of a potential food source for some folks but how about we grow some extra crops instead of the deer meat. This deer issue is a fringe case anyway, what about all the farm animals that get slaughtered in inefficient and brutal ways after having lived miserable lives in cages and stalls.

I think it'll be pretty easy to justify all this but like I said no time for big internet trawl tonight, going to bed in 20 mins. I'm not saying I think everyone in the world should stop eating meat immediately, I'm just talking about the people in socio-economic groups for whom it's a realistic option.

And I said already the there's no reason to eat meat part is just the baseline for the argument, all the rest of the stuff is built on top of it like the whole ridiculous cruelty issue which none of you seem to care about even though it's a pretty big deal and if you think otherwise then I don't really care what else you've got to say about it.

Anyway i'm gonna mull on it all day at work tomorrow...

Last Edit: April 14, 2009, 11:33:14 pm by jamie
  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
dependent on us eating them? Nah, that crap will work itself out. If there's too many of a species then they'll dwindle down to a sustainable number naturally pretty quickly without us lending a helping hand, and yeah that's a waste of a potential food source for some folks but how about we grow some extra crops instead of the deer meat. This deer issue is a fringe case anyway, what about all the farm animals that get slaughtered in inefficient and brutal ways after having lived miserable lives in cages and stalls.

Is it really better to let animals dwindle down by dying of starvation instead of eating them (a lot of people DO eat the deer they kill hunting)?

Quote
And I said already the there's no reason to eat meat part is just the baseline for the argument, all the rest of the stuff is built on top of it like the whole ridiculous cruelty issue which none of you seem to care about even though it's a pretty big deal and if you think otherwise then I don't really care what else you've got to say about it.

That's because the cruelty as far as big-industry farms go isn't a be-all end-all argument against eating meat.  If you raise your own healthy animals in a good environment and they live healthy lives before you eat them, it's not anywhere near the same thing as animals that are cooped up in tiny cages where they can't move.  I don't think anyone here is arguing that cruelty is okay, but those farms aren't the only way to get meat, and if the argument is about whether or not eating meat is okay you can't base it all on just one possibility.  It's the BIGGEST way people get meat, but it's far from the only.  I don't really want to get into this whole argument for the billionth time but you can be against animal cruelty without being against eating meat.
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
Quote
Is it really better to let animals dwindle down by dying of starvation instead of eating them

at this point, yes.
brian chemicals
  • Avatar of Barack Obama
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 16, 2008
  • Posts: 5244
This deer issue is a fringe case anyway, what about all the farm animals that get slaughtered in inefficient and brutal ways after having lived miserable lives in cages and stalls.
who cares about the feelings of farm animals? Not me.

I'm not a big fan of factory farms, but there's no way I'd ever have second thoughts about putting a slug in a cow's dome if I'm a hungry farmer.
  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
at this point, yes.

how so?
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
i dont care about factory animals, i care about factory farms. the economic, personal health, and environmental impact of this shit is quickly reaching hilarious levels. this is the ethics of eating, now let me gavache a chinese immigrant.

how so?

see above. 1/5th of greenhouse gas. ONE FIFTH. from cow farts. yeah mercy killing could honestly have something behind it.
brian chemicals
  • Avatar of Alec
  • Watch out Kitty! The room turned sideways!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Apr 16, 2003
  • Posts: 1894
honestly i'm ignoring any cruelty arguments cause they're dumb and more an argument for EAT ORGANIC or something than vegetarianism. Basically there's nothing ethical or unethical about WHAT we choose to eat. maybe the way it was raised/etc but what we eat doesn't fucking matter. There is the whole we're hard-wired to eat meat/have omnivorous tooth structures/etc that i brought up in a previous veg debate but really it boils down to personal choice. It's pretty immoral to judge someone based on their choice of diet, imo. Seriously do you judge a pig or a crow or a giant panda if you see it eating another animal because THEY CAN SURVIVE withOUt IT TOO. It's a ridiculous argument. I'm not anti-vegetarian but i'm very anti-activism because really fuck you.

ALSO I wouldn't eat a dog or a cat because their meat is grisly and probably doesn't taste good at all.
  • Avatar of Doktormartini
  • Stop Radioactivity!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 24, 2003
  • Posts: 1949
Heh vegan thread Dok has to post lawlz.

I am an activist but I haven't really done any activism regarding animals, my activism has been with my college's peace group.

Anyways, my views have changed a bit.  I'm still a vegan but I'm not gay about it.  I don't care if people eat meat.  I like people to understand where it comes from.  I tell people to eat organically grown, local, grass fed, free ranged meats because
1.  It's proven to be healthier.
2.  It's better for the environment.
3.  The animals aren't treated like shit.
4.  Almost all people agree it tastes better.

I've been really getting into indigenous cultures and their ways of life.  I love learning about cultures who subsist on hunting and gathering, or horticulture...etc.  I realize that these people eat meat.  The thing is, gather consists of way more of their diet than hunting.  Also, the meats are natural and the animals aren't treated like shit.  They are killed and eaten like almost all other animals would do. 

I don't try to convert people.  I used be kinda gay about this but now I'm not.  I still think it's kinda dumb to eat animals when other options are available, but like I said, if you eat animals, eat the grass fed organic ones.  Americans eat way to much meat and not enough vegetables (to most of the people I know the only veggies they eat are potatoes and corn).

*completely ignores the fact that many animal species are dependent (or domesticated!) on humans eating them to maintain a survivable population*
This is true but I'm anti-domestication.
Dok Choy
  • Avatar of Ryan
  • thx ds k?
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 22, 2003
  • Posts: 4460
wow dok that was a pretty good post!

also what do you mean by anti-domestication? how would you go about un-domesticating cow/sheep/pigs/horses/whatever?
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
simple....just set em free....
  • Avatar of Doktormartini
  • Stop Radioactivity!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 24, 2003
  • Posts: 1949
wow dok that was a pretty good post!

also what do you mean by anti-domestication? how would you go about un-domesticating cow/sheep/pigs/horses/whatever?
Thank you.  I wrote a paper for my anthropology class on domestication/the agricultural revolution and how it fucked up the world (and got a 97% on it btw).  It sucks.  I don't know how to go about un-domesticating the world :(​  Obviously if we just stopped everything than that would lead to extremely bad consequences.  One problem we have is that every year we increase food production.  Population increase is an almost direct relation to food production.  More food = more people.  Maybe stop increasing food production.  I'm not saying stop food production, just keep it at an equilibrium.  We need to start relying more on the millions of things in the wild rather than things on the shelves (at least in my opinion).  Hence why I go eat dandelions and shite.
Dok Choy
  • Avatar of Ryan
  • thx ds k?
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 22, 2003
  • Posts: 4460
okay well you can't just stop increasing food production when population increases as well. you realize this, right?

a lot of the shit you say is very obvious. everyone knows it would be better to rely on local production instead of massive factory farms, and to eat from grass fed animals and not animals drugged on up steroids, but the problem is how to actually achieve this without a worldwide famine caused by food shortages.
  • Avatar of Doktormartini
  • Stop Radioactivity!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 24, 2003
  • Posts: 1949
okay well you can't just stop increasing food production when population increases as well. you realize this, right?

a lot of the shit you say is very obvious. everyone knows it would be better to rely on local production instead of massive factory farms, and to eat from grass fed animals and not animals drugged on up steroids, but the problem is how to actually achieve this without a worldwide famine caused by food shortages.
Food shortages wouldn't happen if we didn't have domestication :)
But yeah, I agree with you.

Also population increases because food increases.
Last Edit: April 15, 2009, 03:29:18 am by Doktormartini
Dok Choy
  • Avatar of Ryan
  • thx ds k?
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 22, 2003
  • Posts: 4460
neither of that is true. population is tied to economic status, it has nothing to do with the availability of food. in fact, poorer families tend to have more children than wealthy ones, regardless of the availability of food.

domestication has nothing to do with food shortages.
  • Avatar of Ryan
  • thx ds k?
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 22, 2003
  • Posts: 4460
I know what you're going to say! there weren't any famines before we began domesticating animals. that's because the human population could only grow enough to sustain itself in whatever region it lived in. we were like deer, if there were more people than available food then the excess died.

ahh paradise...
  • Avatar of Doktormartini
  • Stop Radioactivity!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 24, 2003
  • Posts: 1949
neither of that is true. population is tied to economic status, it has nothing to do with the availability of food. in fact, poorer families tend to have more children than wealthy ones, regardless of the availability of food.

domestication has nothing to do with food shortages.
http://panearth.org/panearth/HumanPopulationNumbers.pdf

http://panearth.org/panearth/world%20food%20&%20human%20population%20growth/player.html
Every single species on earth increases it's population when more food is available, why are we exempt?  We aren't.

Also it is true.  Think about it.  Hunter-gatherers ate a much more variety of food than we do.  We depend on soy, wheat, and corn majorly.  What would happen if these foods were suddenly unavailable for a month?  We'd be fucked.  Potato Famine???
Dok Choy
  • Avatar of Ryan
  • thx ds k?
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 22, 2003
  • Posts: 4460
uh. hunter gatherers were just as dependent on certain groups of plants and animals as we are on corn or potatoes. so dependent that they were forced to relocate constantly in order to follow herds of animals.

population has been falling worldwide since 1962 despite massive increases in food production. the fact is that the supply of food is concentrated in the wealthier countries, yet despite this the fastest growing populations are among the lower classes.
  • Avatar of Ryan
  • thx ds k?
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 22, 2003
  • Posts: 4460
wealthier countries typically have the lowest birthrates, despite the abundant amount of food available.

sorry dok this is not prehistory, availability of food isn't anywhere close to being the determining factor for population growth. it has much more to do with public knowledge/availability of contraceptions and amount of available medical care.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jun 22, 2005
  • Posts: 1325
I think it is a fact that humans are one of the few animals that breed over their natural food limit only to die of starvation if they cannot force an increase in their food sources! Most animals don't do this. Most animals only breed when they don't have to worry about things like: a) starving to death imminently and b) starving to death sort of later.

I find it incredible, the irony; humanity's brainpower allows us to seek out sexual pleasure and get as much as we can, but it doesn't help us to contain our numbers using contraceptives (not all of us, anyways, which is bad). It is at some dangerous level. Like a knife-wielding retard! WATCH OUT!

I have a vegan friend. He's a good guy. He doesn't really say anything about it; his whole stance on the matter is that no one living thing has the right to decide if another lives or dies. He understands the natural order, but believes as humans we should held to a higher level of accountability for our actions. I understand his argument, but disagree; we leave it at that. Once I ate a big juicy steak in front of him. I was torn between my feelings of guilt (not at eating meat but at rubbing in his face the fact that he might be insulted) and my feelings of wanting to rub the steak in his sickly vegan face!

But he didn't care either way. He understands people eat meat. Oh well. People will always meat.

Also, how stupid can you possibly be to assume that we can all live on free-range magical food sources? Of course it would be nice, but some ridiculous percentage of the food we consume is grown in tight-packed, horrid conditions. I'd like to see those conditions improved, if only nominally- there is a difference between "necessity" and "cost maximization" and it would be nice to find a balance somewhere above "absolute worst conditions possible".

Don't you recall the fucking FOOD CRISIS we were having in Egypt like last year, Dok? The government had the army come in and bake bread out of grain they imported from other countries. Grain shortages still exist and are a real fear, BUT now, thanks to industrialized farming, we can create more food than we need. Surpluses mean we can actually send food to other countries that need it (or sell it, heh heh heh capitalism). We wouldn't have these surpluses if not for MASSIVELY industrialized farming. You are a silly person, Doktormartini.

Although you know what would be awesome? Market gardens for every house! The utopian world of tomorrow sees every home have an aeroponic greenhouse... ahh, the future...

edit: does anyone else see a dong flopping down in Dok's avatar? I mean Bob Dylan's a cool guy but choose a picture without a dongmic in it pal
Last Edit: April 15, 2009, 04:43:39 am by Kaempfer
The Misadventures of Crimebot
  • Avatar of Evangel
  • brown priyde yea mayne
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Nov 19, 2002
  • Posts: 1621
I think street activism really alienates more people from your cause than it draws to it.  Look at street evangelists.  How many people do you think change their ways after watching them scream fire and brimstone on society?  In fact, most people are extremely put off by it.  No matter your belief, leading by example is usually the best way to effectively change minds.  No one likes to be told how to live.

Your best bet is to continue your vegetarianism, and explain your beliefs to anyone that asks why you are not eating meat.  One day someone is going to think, "hey, I know a lot of vegetarians, and they're really doing something different, maybe I'll dapple in that."

keep posting...