arbitrary as in not having any basis in logic or objectivity at all. let us examine which is less arbitrary: determining what could be viewed as ethical or unethical in terms of how much harm is done versus what is gained from an act orrrr just doing or not doing something, regardless of its positive or negative impact, because that dude over there who most certainly isnt god told you to because HE was told so by the world's longest game of telephone. mmm or maybe i'm dumb for bothering with you at all. fell right into ya trap. . .
how is anyone even arguing this this is unarguable, base something off a book or make it up as you go along, which is more arbitrary?