that kind of imperialist cheerleading bullshit
i honestly do not know where you're getting this from
my point was that sometimes (i.e. yes rwanda, not iraq) it's necessary to step in and protect those who simply aren't equipped to defend themselves (the tutsi minority, the minority opposition forces in libya). it's quite literally protection in libya in terms of enforcing a no-fly zone and preventing gaddafi's forces from advancing
this is where the situation differs to iraq. there was very little in terms of active popular opposition to saddam hussein prior to the invasion and there was no intention of invading iraq on that basis; the coalition forces ostensibly went in on the (incorrect, fraudulant, bullshit) basis of WMD capability (read: mmmm oil or whatever takes your fancy). it was certainly right to remove saddam hussein from power and / or hold him accountable for many many years of reprehensible bullshit, but unquestionably not like this
summary: defense is not the same as aggression, which was where iraq was shitty and this isn't so much