"homosexual" is a very neutral word. you can say it in a neutral fashion or in a negative fashion (e.g. those goddamn disgusting homosexuals) but the word "faggot" is not neutral and has a solely negative implication. you literally cannot say "faggot" in a positive fashion with a straight face without being extremely misguided about its value.
This is entirely true, but what I was trying to say: That faggot being only negative bad seems arbitrary. but I guess being arbitrary is human nature. And I suppose its a moot point.
I'm sorry you weren't born as a poor black trans woman disabled lesbian but you weren't.
Not what I'm talking about. I'm not saying I want to BE a minority (which isn't controllable). My problem is that, in the case discussion of minority issues, bitterness arises when one is excluded from a controllable thing. Like saying a word or join a discussion group/topic related to it. (I distinctly remember in fact a conversation had here on SW where it was said that non-minorities don't have anything worthwhile at all to say on the topic of a minority's hardships, and should be allowed to participate, this comes off as completely untrue.) Having some sort of controlled differences between groups of people reinforces stereotypes and destroys unity among the human race.
If I encountered a poor black trans woman disabled lesbian and the topic of all her troubles came up and she refused to hear my perspective, I'd tell her like-wise. A discussion is a 2-way street, and most people don't like being lectured. If I'm listening to you, you damn well better listen to me, and vice versa. I'm not saying that the majority should get to outright make the decisions for a minority, but I do think a person or persons from a majority group should be heard if they wish to participate in the process. Hell, its not like all the people in a minority group all think the same thing anyway. You get different viewpoints with or with out people from the majorities.
To DDay:
Yeah you pretty much should stop with that. You aren't a percent as bad as mince was, but you should still try and stop. I imagine that might be asking a lot but the effect would be overall beneficial.
to Farren:
I believe trying to SHAME someone for being this way (or any way) is the worst possible thing you could do because you aren't going to convert anyone that way, or if you do, its obvious the person you converted doesn't think much of them self. And sometimes its seems like that is the avenue people here go for. I know you marginalize terrible beliefs (maybe, or maybe you make them more noticeable) but it still makes it out like its some sort of verbal/idea war rather than just trying to help things.