I really don't care about jihadjerry or anything he's done. it's a joke that we're even discussing him at all. I don't think it's "right" that he got banned, I just don't care. was it even a permaban? don't tell me.
no, but I think you're arguing I did this not because of some broader argument pertaining to what is or isn't an acceptable level of discourse generally, but because I personally don't like the discussion. that's not the case. there are tons of viewpoints I find legitimately disgusting, but only a few particularly egregious ones are worth taking action over for the reasons I outlined.
the reason why I ask you if you'd argue the same thing were it someone else is to point out that this would mean no admin could ever have made this decision lest they be branded as being personally too involved to make a levelheaded decision out of concern for the forum. you keep falling back to this idea that I'm just abusing my power to limit and restrict everyone to a personal, arbitrary moral code because I don't like seeing certain types of discussions.
I'd love to argue more but I'll be leaving on vacation soon. then again I don't think there's much else that hasn't been said.
oh ic. yeah, "you" was never intended to be personal. you just happen to be the guy who can ban/unban. it's not some flaw or caveat of your being I was trying to point out, it's just because until recently you literally gave no explanation for your decision other than "it's racism, it's horrible, naturally we ban horrible people":
yeah.
it's because I personally found him annoying.
it couldn't POSSIBLY be that he's a completely awful person who calls black people ghetto rats and believes racism doesn't really exist and all that's wrong with minorities can be blamed entirely on their own inherent stupidity. that's just not conceivable. it couldn't be that konix linked to a video of a black guy being executed irl on the racist forums inri says he visits and he said the video was pretty funny. OUTSIDE OF THE REALM OF POSSIBILITY.
I said to begin with that the only way you could justify banning him is if you could argue he's actually detrimental to the forums, which went disregarded until your second most-recent post.
I still disagree that he's detrimental, but I'm not gonna argue about it any further