Politics The Nintendo 64/Playstation One Generation (Read 2007 times)

  • Avatar of Zeitgeist
  • World Wonder
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Oct 7, 2007
  • Posts: 57
Is the best generation gaming has ever seen, without counting the accomplishments of the first generation.

In my opinion, the gaming of today blows hardcore. The PS3 and 360 have a few key games each that focus mainly on online play, which I view as flawed (I view these as flawed because they are basically forcing you to pay for online play regardless of whether or not you want it, because that's where all the features are. I know that PS3's online is free, but you are not at any time guaranteed a good quality online game unless you are actually shelling out money for said online service). The Wii tries to promote gameplay, but ends up lacking when compared to the Nintendo 64/Playstation One generation, imo. I've owned one. Nothing besides Galaxy and Twilight Princess have aroused my interest. I beat both of them and did not feel the want nor need to go back and play through either of them that I have had for years when it comes to Super Mario 64 and The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. Not to mention the Wii lacks capable specs, the 360 breaks down every time a full moon passes around, and the PS3 doesn't seem promising at all (lack of GOOD exclusives so far and lack of GOOD exclusives in the future really prey upon it).

This is strictly my opinion, but I will back it up with some fact.

1.) The Nintendo 64/Playstation One generation was the first era of 3D gaming. It's basically the median between the "ancient" generations of NES and SNES/Genesis respectively, and the current generation which is run completely on either cheap gimmicks or complete graphic-based/advertised hype.

2.) Said era introduced the first games of their kind, creating a gaming landmark.

3.) Gameplay was heavily favored in basically any game you could pick up and play from this generation. Not many people were worried about graphics at this point because it was just the first step towards mainstream 3D gaming. It was all about the gameplay at this point in the history of gaming; now it's nothing but making sure something looks good.

As I said, this is just my opinion, but I think that:

1.) Gaming cannot get any better than it currently is. In fact, it will get worse.

2.) Gaming will not see another generation that was as influential as the N64/PS1 generation.

3.) Graphics are now the mainstream concern, meaning that the games will sell even if they have an hour of atrocious gameplay and terrible controls (as long as it looks good).

My question is, do you agree or disagree with any points made here, or the general idea that the N64/PS1 generation was indeed the best gaming generation? Back up with your statements with your own opinion and/or good reasoning/facts; I want to get an entire debate rolling out of this topic.
Last Edit: February 01, 2008, 02:30:55 am by Zeitgeist
  • Avatar of Rowain
  • 100% not arab
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 2, 2002
  • Posts: 1739
It's a good thing you kept reiterating that this is all just your opinion. I might've taken issues otherwise!
WHY SO SERIOUS HAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA
  • Avatar of Zeitgeist
  • World Wonder
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Oct 7, 2007
  • Posts: 57
It's a good thing you kept reiterating that this is all just your opinion. I might've taken issues otherwise!

I just would like to see if people agree with me on this. It may be extreme in some cases, but at least some of my points are at least somewhat valid.
  • Avatar of Mama Luigi
  • Wind of Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 16, 2004
  • Posts: 1282
I think you are right and wrong in some most aspects. Gaming has a long way to go yet, and I mean a LONG way to go. You said, "Gaming cannot get any better than it currently is. In fact, it will get worse," and I couldn't possibly disagree more. I can just sit here and come up with AMAZING games that don't exist due to technological limitations (lack of powerful enough servers, AI not smart enough yet, etc). I also think you are downplaying the importance of graphics and ignoring the fact that we HAVE had some great games already this generation - there's plenty more to come. The increase in power on these gaming machines is allowing us to experience more complex games than ever before.

Look at games like Crysis, Bioshock, Devil May Cry 4, Portal, Mass Effect, Oblivion, Spore... none of these experiences would have been even remotely possible on the N64 or PS1.

I mean, you praise the N64/PS1 era, but surely you couldn't expect them to stay in that era forever now could you? Logic would follow that they wouldn't one day just say "uh yeah I guess the graphics/power/everything is good enough we don't need to make more gaming consoles to stay competitive and meet consumer demand" would they? What we are seeing is a natural evolution of games. You complain that graphics are now the main concern. Hah, since when has it not been the main concern? Until we reach photorealism, they will be the main concern. If your argument was true that only recently graphics became important than we probably wouldn't have seen anything past the SNES (the graphics were good enough).

Also I think the SNES generation was a much better one.

EDIT: Yes I keep expanding this post.
Last Edit: February 01, 2008, 03:21:42 am by Mr Epic Hero
  • Saved by the King!
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Aug 12, 2006
  • Posts: 94
I just would like to see if people agree with me on this. It may be extreme in some cases, but at least some of my points are at least somewhat valid.
Not really...
I mean I do like alot of PSOne and N64 games, but... These days games are just plainly better, I mean I just got Oblivion and I can't decide wat to do because it is so much fun.

Quote
3.) Graphics are now the mainstream concern, meaning that the games will sell even if they have an hour of atrocious gameplay and terrible controls (as long as it looks good).

Have you played any games lately. Because you are just blinded to todays mass of excellent games.



Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?
Final Fantasy 7
  • Avatar of Zeitgeist
  • World Wonder
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Oct 7, 2007
  • Posts: 57
I think you are right and wrong in some aspects. Gaming has a long way to go yet, and I mean a LONG way to go. You said, "Gaming cannot get any better than it currently is. In fact, it will get worse," and I couldn't possibly disagree more. I can just sit here and come up with AMAZING games that don't exist due to technological limitations (lack of powerful enough servers, AI not smart enough yet, etc). I also think you are downplaying the importance of graphics and ignoring the fact that we HAVE had some great games already this generation - there's plenty more to come. The increase in power on these gaming machines is allowing us to experience more complex games than ever before.

Look at games like Crysis, Bioshock, Devil May Cry 4, Spore... none of these experiences would have been even remotely possible on the N64 or PS1.

Probably. What I mean't by "In fact, it will get worse," is that the genres that were developed in the N64/PS1 generation have been basically beaten to death if not in the current generation, in future generations. The N64/PS1 generation by itself puts out an experience of "freshness" that while in itself seems like a contradiction because the games are very old, still explains the experience because the games were developed at the time where the genres were just being formed and there was no real redundancy. I do agree that Bioshock for one gave an excellent gameplay experience, but I'm generalizing the game libraries based on the majority of said library at this current moment. Also, as I said, I believe that the PS1/N64 gen was the first step in the direction of 3D gaming. It was not even thought of as far as consoles go at the time of the SNES/Genesis gen (I'm not a buff on the history of computer gaming, so I'm just assuming that they were at the level of 3D graphics at the point of SNES/Genesis). I also never mentioned that people should stay in the N64/PS1 generation, I am merely stating that this generation was the best as far as the quality of games and any other factors you could even consider go, and that I really don't think any certain generation of gaming will get it right as many times as the N64/PS1 generation did.

Lainge: Oblivion is not a bad game. Nowhere in my original post did I directly single out Oblivion and say it was a bad game, nor do I think so. Also, the majority of the games that you call "new" and/or "excellent" can be looked upon as terrible shortly down the road. Excellence is not something a game retains unless it really, really deserves it and I doubt that more than a handful so far this generation deserve any type of mention of "excellence". Also, I've owned a 360 for over a year and a half (make that 3 360s), and I've had a Wii for about 5 months.
Last Edit: February 01, 2008, 03:33:09 am by Zeitgeist
  • Saved by the King!
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Aug 12, 2006
  • Posts: 94
Lainge: Oblivion is not a bad game. Nowhere in my original post did I directly single out Oblivion and say it was a bad game
I didn't say you did...

But what games do you specifically like on PSOne and N64?

I do admit my favourite game is a on Playstation. 'Jade Cocoon'...
But some of the other games that were released back then just do not hold my interest anymore, such as Kula World. (Not sure if that's the exact name. The one with a ball)



Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?
Final Fantasy 7
  • Avatar of Zeitgeist
  • World Wonder
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Oct 7, 2007
  • Posts: 57
I didn't say you did...

But what games do you specifically like on PSOne and N64?

I do admit my favourite game is a on Playstation. 'Jade Cocoon'...
But some of the other games that were released back then just do not hold my interest anymore, such as Kula World. (Not sure if that's the exact name. The one with a ball)

My favorites have to be Mario 64, Ocarina of Time, Legend of Legaia, Brave Fencer Musashi, and several other RPGs that were not continued past that gen/other gen defining series' such as Bandicoot, Spyro, Gex, etc.
  • Avatar of Sarhan
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 5, 2005
  • Posts: 943
My favorites have to be Mario 64, Ocarina of Time, Legend of Legaia, Brave Fencer Musashi, and several other RPGs that were not continued past that gen/other gen defining series' such as Bandicoot, Spyro, Gex, etc.

I completely agree with you. With the exception of a few games, the 64/PS1 days were the best gaming has seen. The ratio of good titles to titles produced seems to have been much larger back then than it is now. Maybe it's the fact that I'm older now and maybe I'm not impressed as easily, but games back then just seemed better.

Oh, and Brave Fencer Musashi is fucking epic.
  • Avatar of Marcus
  • THE FAT ONE
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Sep 28, 2002
  • Posts: 2690
I would post my own WALL OF TEXT breaking down your arguments but I have some art to finish so I'll keep it short.

People who think one specific generation of gaming is better than another is either blinded with nostalgia or doesn't know what they're talking about.  Games today are actually more difficult to make than games 10 years ago because not only do you have to keep up with the latest technological advances you also have to appeal to a growingly jaded audience.  The average gamer is over 20 meaning he's played shit from the NES period on up and those that are new to games have to get something that's high in the "WOW" factor and fun in the gameplay factor as well.

Games use to be a niche market that only the hardcorest of nerds bothered with but it's accessible to all and a multi-billion dollar franchise bordering on Hollywood production values BECAUSE it's gotten better over the years.  There are very, very few (read: VERY VERY FEW) games of this generation that specifically focus on online play and if you honestly think there's nothing of value for you then you're not looking hard enough or maybe you just don't like videogames as much as you thought you did.

As far as no good games being available EASE BACK.  This shits only been out for a year, except the 360 which already has quite a few good titles on it.  This spring has a ready rad slew of gaming goodness coming out (SPORE, LittleBigPlanet, MGS4, Too Human, Dark Sector, Smash Bros Brawl, blah blah blah) so give it a little more time.  The PS2 was a shovelware dumping ground it's first year and then it exploded with weeaboo rpg's and platformers.
  • "BOOSH"
  • PipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Aug 14, 2007
  • Posts: 284
These were simpler times.
I still have a 64. It provides endless entertainment to this day.
You 360 people may have your fancy technology and graphics, but us 64 people have Mario 64, Ocarina of Time, Majora's Mask, Star Fox 64, Donkey Kong 64, Banjo Kazooie and Tooie, Bomberman 64, Goldeneye 007, Duke Nukem, Rayman 2, 1080, and many more that I can't think of...
I'm not saying it's better, but to me, it's a little more entertaining sometimes. Just going back and playing some memorable games.
I imagine in 10-20 years, the 360 will be the new 64. "You know, I remember Gears of War. Sure it's not as great as these games today, but it was damn fun. In fact, I still have a 360."
  • Avatar of big ass skelly
  • Ò_Ó
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 12, 2002
  • Posts: 4313
I just want to make it absolutely clear that I Am NOT Nathan Petrilli and neither are you.

N64s are kewl though 8-)
  • Sensitive to context
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Aug 17, 2007
  • Posts: 66
no multiplayer game will ever be as much fun as Goldeneye was.
nor will any single player experience be as flawless as OOT.

(long live the MEGAdrive though)
Last Edit: February 01, 2008, 10:02:31 am by Pugwash
oof
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Feb 1, 2008
  • Posts: 77
Nostalgia makes the N64/ PSOne generation seem a lot better than it actually was.  Yes there were a lot of great games, but we also had a lot of great games and memories in the Mega Drive/ Super Nintendo generation, heck, I quite enjoyed the PS2/ XBox/ GC gen - Eternal Darkness, Resident Evil 4, Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, Halo, Half Life 2, Grand Theft Auto 3, Viewtiful Joe, Shadow of the Colossus, Gitaroo Man, Burnout, TimeSplitters, Guitar Hero...

And I'm optimistic about this generation.
  • Avatar of Neophyte
  • Master of Darkness
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 20, 2003
  • Posts: 1296
Clearly you guys are basing your views off of nostalgia, except for Marcus and a few others.
I do agree to a point though. I LOVE the SNES days, where I enjoyed just about every RPG it had, regardless of whether it was good or not. The catchy tunes and things like that stay in your head forever.
While the SNES/N64 days did start the games that are now in their third and fourth titles, it is by no means better than the current gen. None of us can say that either gen is better or worse right now, since the current gen has just started. Just putting in my opinion.


And Half Life 2 rocks.
Last Edit: February 01, 2008, 04:18:30 pm by Neophyte
  • Avatar of Swordfish
  • Comrade!?! I AM NOT A FUCKING RUSSIAN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Sep 12, 2003
  • Posts: 1074
And Half Life 2 rocks.

AMEN to that! but Team fortress 2 also rocks, and so does guitar hero, and halo 3 multiplayer, City of heroes, Eve online... well the list could go on but i have better things to do :)​.
RIP DoktorMartini

My brute!
  • BAA2U
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Aug 7, 2007
  • Posts: 1403
gears of war, portal, and crysis are definite titles that stick out from this generation, to me
  • Avatar of maladroithim
  • Epic Hero
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 22, 2004
  • Posts: 1008
3.) Gameplay was heavily favored in basically any game you could pick up and play from this generation. Not many people were worried about graphics at this point because it was just the first step towards mainstream 3D gaming. It was all about the gameplay at this point in the history of gaming; now it's nothing but making sure something looks good.

This is patently untrue.  I recall the marketing of the consoles at that time touting 3D graphics as an incredible innovation that would change videogames forever.  They were right, but that's beside the point.  The marketing and praise for games like Final Fantasy VII and Mario 64 focused very heavily on the graphics; I remember TV commercials for Final Fantasy VII showing these amazing videos of cutscenes and never once mentioning that maybe you would enjoy the story or exploring dungeons.  Marketing for the new consoles told me ridiculous things like "Powered by the same technology that made the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park!" and other things.  Certainly game designers then and now like to make games that are fun because they drive review scores and in turn drive sales to core gamers (who buy games that get high review scores and turn titles like Bioshock into million-sellers).  Before the game is released, though, all you really have to show are screenshots; developers now and then can't help but focus on how a game looks if they don't have anything to give people to play.
  • Avatar of JohnnyCasil
  • Comrade!
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jan 5, 2005
  • Posts: 453
I remember TV commercials for Final Fantasy VII showing these amazing videos of cutscenes and never once mentioning that maybe you would enjoy the story or exploring dungeons.

This reminds me of when FFVII came out.  I remember seeing all commercials and thinking, "Wow, this is the most amazing game I have ever scene, but how do you play in a world that is so graphically complex."  I didn't have a PSX at the time, so I went to my friend's house to play it.  Upon seeing the actual gameplay, I thought to myself, "What game were they advertising?"
  • Avatar of kentona
  • even more eviler than Skeletor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2005
  • Posts: 1240
You 360 people may have your fancy technology and graphics, but us 64 people have Mario 64, Ocarina of Time, Majora's Mask, Star Fox 64, Donkey Kong 64, Banjo Kazooie and Tooie, Bomberman 64, Goldeneye 007, Duke Nukem, Rayman 2, 1080, and many more that I can't think of...
Bah, you 64 people may have your fancy technology and graphics, but us SNES people have Super Mario World, Link to the Past, Star Fox, Donkey Kong Country, Super Bomberman, Contra, not to mention the best crop of RPGs ever released.

PS.  Feel free to rebutt with NES examples.

..:: Full game is released.  Download it now! ::..