goooooooooooooddamn i don't think i should respond this since it increases the amount of pointless posts/arguements but i try to bring something new here then
Are you serious? You have no idea what you are talking about. So much water and grain feed go into each pound of beef produced that the calorie ratio is seriously like 1 : 100. Eating meat is a horribly inefficient to get energy from the sun and into our bodies.
Also lions are mammals.
Haha i meant crodociles with that lion thing.
I admit that i am not entirely sure about my information but i refuse that my posts are null and void because of this! Like i said this is what i have leant and
remember so it is possible that i am wrong, yes, since i cannot check my sources easily. So i will admit my mistake if i am guilty of such, to promote discussion.
Let me clarify my argument. My argument is connected to Awakening's post about human's cellulose digestion: (short quote)
CELLULOSE makes up plant tissue. The human body can't effectively digest cellulose (at this point in our evolutionary history), meaning the absorption of nutrients from most "vegan diets" is minimal at best.
I am saying that while cattle meat's efficiency isn't quite good (THIS is what i agree on), the amount of wheat/vegetables/etc required is still high due to inefficient cellulose digestion.
What i do agree on with you, maladroit, is that it is scientifically proven that cattle's meat efficiency is truly lower than pig's or poultry's so yeah, if western lifestyle is something guilty of then it is to the promoting of the more inefficient meat which is a luxury unfortunately becoming general around the NICs and to-be NICs (or so i understood.) Poultry and pig is still the most common meat produced outside West, like in e.g. Asia (China first comes in mind). So uh, Morality of cattle vs. poultry/swine? I don't think i have seen this issue raised on here yet.