lemme wax a bit philosophical I guess.
first off obviously the purpose of getting new members is selfish because we do not want just NEW MEMBERS; we want some type of interesting members. in ten minutes we could boost gw's audience a hundred members by making it a furry website. just pointing out this is not about new members, this is about, for lack of a better term, sustainable members.
let's use Velfarre as an example. I'm using Velfarre because our interests, while not opposite, certainly don't overlay. I read all sorts of books, listen to all sorts of music, have cancer, have some political interest, and watch few movies. I post about these things. Velfarre seems to get constantly sick (she cannot eat Totinos), enjoys a lot of weird fringe nerd culture like Doraemon, Lazytown, and Hitchhikers Guide, I don't think I've ever seen her post about music or non-obscure comic books, and I bet she watches more movies than I do. but we are both members who will post a lot, simply because she, and I assume almost anyone who posts in a forum called General, enjoy GENERAL discussion. we all have specific interests, but we also enjoy talking about a variety of subjects. the problem here is that you create a forum almost of dilettantes, which is why it's not sustainable as a mainsite; how jarring would it would be if the mainsite went from articles about obscure strategy games to Top Chef to John Grisham novels (someone's looking around their rooooom!!!)? and who would go to this site? of course, once you're part of it, this kind of shotgun approach works well; it's why What's On Your Mind, despite having the highest ratio of bullshit posts to normal ones, is one of our most popular topics, and why AM which is, what, less than six months old and basically 50% my topics about THINGS I SAW TODAY, is some people's favorite forum.
but let's take someone like Heath. Heath is possibly ex staffer and G&D mod Ciel, maybe not, I don't know. but all Heath seems to post is one kind of post; something mocking G&D. occasionally Heath ventured into 9/11 but mostly only to mock G&D more.
and even that could be okay, except Heath was one of the primary people who made fun of Konix for being slightly irritated someone took a private sprite without asking.
this kind of member might stick around, might not, but I speak for myself and a few others when I say I don't want him around. half of G&D and almost all of that stupid WE'RE ANTI G&D (ITS ALL WE ARE) crew is so absolutely boring and one note and just depraved of genuine thought process I don't want to read what they have to say! these have somehow become VERY DUMB PEOPLE. Velfarre makes kind of boring posts too but at least she displays a fucking spark of a neuron firing and that's not meant to be an insult to Velfarre but to the people who just DON'T.
and when I say this I don't mean they don't share my opinion. someone like Bled I often don't agree with, but Bled is still a sustainable member because while I think he can be really really dumb a lot he's not intrinsically dumb like some of these people.
so the two assumptions I think GW6 is relying on are as follows.
1. if we attract real gamemakers or people who at least want to be legit gamemakers instead of dudes who are still using RM in the exact same boring way as everyone else and obsess over "realistic dialogue" and then quote Star Wars EU novels, as signified just from their creativity, they will be salvageable actual members.
this is a dangerous assumption but not as bad as the next:
2. some percent of these members will be attracted to the GW community and style outside of just gamemaking and stick around.
these are the two assumptions I think we're working on, and they aren't the strongest, but honestly as Konix has said, we've talked about this a lot and it's basically our last shot! GW can have a theoretical infinite lifespan but if this fails it's pretty clear we have to go back to a drawing board and make it INTELLIGENT FURRY PORN DISCUSSION SITE or something.