How about instead of always coming across as sarcastic assholes, we talk to each other normally? Just because we disagree doesn't mean I should have to wade through your snide tones.
You're a massive hypocrite. And if you'd stop thinking about yourself for just one minute, you'd see there are more important things in order here.
Maybe we should actually use the warning system for this, three strikes you're out. Not really being facetious here. It's not terribly fun seeing the snide bandwagon roll in whenever somebody steps out of line. It's probably better for the atmosphere of this place if we just handle that administratively than keep going down this road, since it IS more or less a rule of the forum now that people are actually getting banned over. I don't think it's going to create the most agreeable environment long term having unwritten rules that can get you thrown out of the community.
I mean, there is some goofy juvenile shame of having a WARNING SYSTEM, but I think people probably want to get along with everybody else, and it would be a way to make those rules clear without necessitating a fight over it, which has begun happening with some frequency. A warning would probably be enough to make people aware of how their behavior is viewed, make necessary corrections so as not to offend others.
I see this as not really a matter of rules, more like a matter of generally being decent. Okay, so not everybody understands that not using slurs is one basic aspect of that, fine—so we tell them. But what I don't understand is why everyone's so surprised when someone who's personally offended by this type of thing, like Geodude just now, could make an emotive response. Tell me, why is that worth this kind of massive consternation? So maybe what he said wasn't helpful—fine. So someone else, like Vellfire just now, can supplement by explaining that we just don't do this kind of thing anymore. That ought to be the end of it. But now you're asking me to make a rule saying you can't respond emotively anymore when you see something you personally disagree with.
The point is, you shouldn't be so surprised that people can respond in an irrational fashion when they feel personally attacked, particularly in response to what they perceive to be a homophobic slur. If you want to call that a "snide bandwagon", you're not in reality. I might agree with you if every single post was unhelpful, but that's not the case. It's literally just one post. The others seem perfectly sensible and legitimate to me, particularly the one where Vellfire says we don't do slurs anymore and Geodude who says you don't get to personally decide what is and what isn't offensive. Maybe you and Afura think the gays are getting too uppity, or that a couple of posts just to bring up an important issue of forum policy is too much to have to go through, but I don't. For the record, I don't think we ought to be having a debate on this at all. We ought to just immediately accept someone's plea for not using a slur, end of story. It's only because of the sudden consternation over having to witness a reaction to a disagreeable post that we're even talking about this.
Well, if that's how it has to be, that's fine. I'll just make a topic outlining what's officially off-limits. But you can't expect me to police people's reactions to these things. And the idea of someone getting mad over seeing something that personally offends them really should not be so foreign to anyone unless you live in another universe.
I hope that clears things up a little!!!