no.
George lucas has INFLUENCE. Like even though the original trilogy were pretty good films (well TESB mainly), they have only really had a negative impact on the film industry. Lucas is one of the people... the main person responsible for the sorry state of movies nowadays, where it's all special effects and no plot. Doubled with the fact that he's an arrogant egotistical prick make him the kind of person you should go for.
Why go for Uwe Boll? He does have a passion for movies but yes they are really really bad, but there is a sincerity in them, he's trying but just doesn;t understand why his movies are so terrible. But Boll has NO INFLUENCE. Going for Boll would do nothing. Only a total idiot would say he's ruining the reputation of games... because ONLY gamers tend to watch his films, and they watch them because they know they are bad. (but yeah HOW DARE HE RUIN OUR PRECIOUS EPIC GAMES LIKE BLOODRAYNE, FARCRY, POSTAL and HOPUSE OF THE DEAD... SUCH STORY DRIVEN GAMES CANNOT BE RUINED I WILL HUNT HIM DOWN AND KILL HIM)
So yeah why go for the insignificant guy who isn't really doing any wrong? The guy with no influence?
Surely this amount of coordinated effort should be targeted towards the lucas' or the tarantinos, y'know, the guys who are ruining cinema.
Things like this are great examples of how the gaming community AS A WHOLE cannot look past it's own small bubble(gaems) and see a big picture... of any kind.